linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] workqueue: use system_highpri_wq for unbind

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAmzW4Pw0K0YsjSfJyhTeNUR9b1ihiXr+C5PJh8gXqFRD84WJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:52:43 +0900
From:	JoonSoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] workqueue: use system_highpri_wq for unbind_work

2012/8/14 Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:02:31AM +0900, JoonSoo Kim wrote:
>> 2012/8/14 Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>:
>> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:17:52AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>> > Is this from an actual workload?  ie. do you have a test case where
>> > this matters?
>>
>> No. it is not from an actual workload.
>> I got this idea suddenly, during implementing others.
>> I will do a test for this tomorrow.
>
> I don't think it's a bad idea and guess this wouldn't make much
> difference under most workload.  Was mostly wondering whether this
> came from some crazy phone powersave optimization.

Okay.
It is not from an actual workload,
but I intent to optimize some crazy phone powersave :)

Thanks for comments.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/