linux-kernel - Re: allocation of contiguous memory in kernel mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 13 Aug 2012 16:02:50 -0600
From:	Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...band.com>
To:	"J.Hwan Kim" <frog1120@...il.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: allocation of contiguous memory in kernel mode

On 08/09/2012 09:47 AM, J.Hwan Kim wrote:
> Hi, everyone
>
> I wish to alloc physically contiguous memory in kernel mode.
> I used the __get_free_pages(gfp_mask, order) function,
> but it fails occasionary.
> I guess it is caused by memory fragmentation.
> My code is kernel driver module which cannot use
> bootmem allocation and its platform is x86_64.
> My server desktop has 20GB memory.
> I wish to know the method to allocate physically
> contiguous memory not failing by fragmentation.

There is no easy answer.

The most portable option is to change the requirements so that you don't 
need physically contiguous memory.  This is what most network devices 
did to handle jumbo frames.

Can you build a new kernel with your code added instead of using a module?

What about booting with artificially limited physical memory (on the 
kernel commandline) and then have the module explictly map in memory 
from above the usual memory limit?

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/