lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1344844273.31459.1.camel@twins>
Date:	Mon, 13 Aug 2012 09:51:13 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: rcu stalls seen with numasched_v2 patches applied.

On Fri, 2012-08-10 at 21:54 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:

> This change worked well on the 2 node machine 
> but on the 8 node machine it hangs with repeated messages
> 
> Pid: 60935, comm: numa01 Tainted: G        W    3.5.0-numasched_v2_020812+ #4
> Call Trace:
> <IRQ>  [<ffffffff810d32e2>] ? rcu_check_callback s+0x632/0x650
> [<ffffffff81061bb8>] ? update_process_times+0x48/0x90
> [<ffffffff810a2a4e>] ? tick_sched_timer+0x6e/0xe0
> [<ffffffff81079c85>] ? __run_hrtimer+0x75/0x1a0
> [<ffffffff810a29e0>] ? tick_setup_sched_timer+0x100/0x100
> [<ffffffff8107a036>] ? hrtimer_interrupt+0xf6/0x250
> [<ffffffff814f1379>] ? smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x69/0x99
> [<ffffffff814f034a>] ? apic_timer_interrupt+0x6a/0x70
> <EOI>  [<ffffffff811082e3>] ? wait_on_page_bit+0x73/0x80
> [<ffffffff814e7992>] ? _raw_spin_lock+0x22/0x30
> [<ffffffff81131bf3>] ? handle_pte_fault+0x1b3/0xca0
> [<ffffffff814e64f7>] ? __schedule+0x2e7/0x710
> [<ffffffff8107a9a8>] ? up_read+0x18/0x30
> [<ffffffff814eb2be>] ? do_page_fault+0x13e/0x460
> [<ffffffff810137ba>] ? __switch_to+0x1aa/0x460
> [<ffffffff814e64f7>] ? __schedule+0x2e7/0x710
> [<ffffffff814e7de5>] ? page_fault+0x25/0x30
> { 3}  (t=62998 jiffies)
> 

If you run a -tip kernel without the numa patches, does that work?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ