[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1344845704.31459.11.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:15:04 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...ionio.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: mutex: hung tasks on SMP platforms with
asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h
On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 12:57 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>
> In other words, I think this should look like this:
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h b/include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h
> index 580a6d35c7..44a66c99c8 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h
> @@ -25,8 +25,11 @@
> static inline void
> __mutex_fastpath_lock(atomic_t *count, void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
> {
> - if (unlikely(atomic_xchg(count, 0) != 1))
> - fail_fn(count);
> + if (unlikely(atomic_xchg(count, 0) != 1)) {
> + /* Mark lock contention explicitly */
> + if (likely(atomic_xchg(count, -1) != 1))
> + fail_fn(count);
> + }
> }
OK, I like this.. Thanks guys! Will will you send a final and complete
patch?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists