[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1344931732-1858-1-git-send-email-yefremov.denis@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:08:52 +0400
From: Denis Efremov <yefremov.denis@...il.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc: Denis Efremov <yefremov.denis@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, pablo@...filter.org,
kaber@...sh.net, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ldv-project@...ras.ru
Subject: [PATCH v2] bridge: rcu_deref outside read-lock section
As it noted in the comment before the br_handle_frame_finish
function, this function should be called under rcu_read_lock.
The problem callgraph:
br_dev_xmit -> br_nf_pre_routing_finish_bridge_slow ->
-> br_handle_frame_finish -> br_port_get_rcu -> rcu_dereference
And in this case there is no read-lock section.
Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <yefremov.denis@...il.com>
---
net/bridge/br_device.c | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_device.c b/net/bridge/br_device.c
index 3334845..f9ae07f 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_device.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_device.c
@@ -33,7 +33,9 @@ netdev_tx_t br_dev_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
#ifdef CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER
if (skb->nf_bridge && (skb->nf_bridge->mask & BRNF_BRIDGED_DNAT)) {
+ rcu_read_lock();
br_nf_pre_routing_finish_bridge_slow(skb);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return NETDEV_TX_OK;
}
#endif
--
1.7.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists