linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/8] mfd: Use the AB8500's IRQ domain to convert hwirq to virq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdbYP3FNNC1nR9c6aYRsqpeaBJjQO4GKeuk05NUBkNcRpg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:25:59 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
	arnd@...db.de, broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] mfd: Use the AB8500's IRQ domain to convert hwirq to virq

On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:

> Before the AB8500 had its own IRQ domain, the IRQ handler would take
> the fired local IRQ (hwirq) and add it to the irq_base to convert it
> to an IRQ number which Linux would understand (virq). However, the
> IRQ base is not always used anymore since we can make use of Linear
> domains. It's better to use the AB8500 hwirq -> virq mapping helper
> function to convert them instead. That's what we do here.
>
> CC: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>

This looks better that what was in there before so
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

However:

> @@ -501,8 +501,9 @@ static irqreturn_t ab8500_irq(int irq, void *dev)
>                 do {
>                         int bit = __ffs(value);
>                         int line = i * 8 + bit;
> +                       int virq = ab8500_irq_get_virq(ab8500, line);
>
> -                       handle_nested_irq(ab8500->irq_base + line);
> +                       handle_nested_irq(virq);
>                         value &= ~(1 << bit);

Still this ab8500_irq_get_virq() business. But is this a static local function
in the ab8500-core.c now? Then it's fine, it's the kernel-wide interface
that is the problem.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/