[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZ-HOGy_sdsCQSNOdYTDzHFszk0OySM88TjO-neSJUz0A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:31:08 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
arnd@...db.de, broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] input: ab8500-ponkey: Rely on MFD core to convert
IRQs to virtual
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> There was a plan to place ab8500_irq_get_virq() calls in each AB8500
> child device prior to requesting an IRQ, but as we're no longer using
> Device Tree to collect our IRQ numbers, it's actually better to allow
> the core to do this during device registration time. So the IRQ number
> we pull from its resource has already been converted to a virtual IRQ.
>
> CC: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
> CC: linux-input@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
This is looking good, I guess you need all patches to go in at the
same time so Dmitry's ACK is required.
FWIW:
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
BTW: this makes me suspect that the public ab8500_irq_get_virq()
interface can be *deleted* and the function made static in the
AB8500 driver, right?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists