[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120814092358.GJ4177@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:23:58 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Jim Schutt <jaschut@...dia.gov>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Improve hugepage allocation success rates under
load V3
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 02:35:46PM -0600, Jim Schutt wrote:
> Hi Mel,
>
> On 08/12/2012 02:22 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> >
> >I went through the patch again but only found the following which is a
> >weak candidate. Still, can you retest with the following patch on top and
> >CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING set please?
> >
>
> I've gotten in several hours of testing on this patch with
> no issues at all, and no output from CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
> (I'm assuming it would show up on a serial console). So,
> it seems to me this patch has done the trick.
>
Super.
> CPU utilization is staying under control, and write-out rate
> is good.
>
Even better.
> You can add my Tested-by: as you see fit. If you work
> up any refinements and would like me to test, please
> let me know.
>
I'll be adding your Tested-by and I'll keep you cc'd on the series. It'll
look a little different because I'm expect to adjust it slightly to match
Andrew's tree but there should be no major surprises and my expectation is
that testing a -rc kernel after it gets merged is all that is necessary. I'm
planning to backport this to -stable but it'll remain to be seen if I can
convince the relevant maintainers that it should be merged.
Thanks.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists