lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbNVV6keGj3mCG4D8ohY4dySEwDreRV5JPrW+Vq8tM6jw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:00:42 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
Cc:	Ravi Kumar V <kumarrav@...eaurora.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] DMAEngine: Add DMAEngine driver based on old MSM
 DMA APIs

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 06:16:39PM +0530, Ravi Kumar V wrote:
>>
>> There is a MSM DMA driver in arch/arm/mach-msm/ which is not in
>> dmaengine framework standards, but that driver is been used by
>> client drivers nand, eMMC and serial drivers. Now if we implement
>> the whole dma driver using dmaengine framework then nand, eMMC like
>> drivers will be failed as they are using old dma driver API's, so
>> instead of implementing new driver from scratch we are keeping the
>> old dma API's as it is and using those API's in new dmaengine
>> framework.So that we can convert clients drivers to use dma engine
>> framework.
>
> Did you investigate converting the drivers (nand, eMMC, serial) ? It
> seems like there would be a 1:1 mapping between the API's , so it might
> only be a find->replace operation.

The eMMC i.e. drivers/mmc/host/msm_sdcc.c should preferably
not be converted, instead switch the platforms over to using
drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c which is already very well enabled for
DMA engine.

Augment it with Qualcomm silicon differences as needed, I do
not think they will be major.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ