linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:31:27 +0200
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
CC:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)

Am 14.08.2012 16:26, schrieb David Howells:
> Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
> 
>>>>   CC      arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.o
>>>> arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.c:96:5: error: redefinition of 'apply_relocate_add'
>>>> include/linux/moduleloader.h:64:19: note: previous definition of 'apply_relocate_add' was here
>>>> make[2]: *** [arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.o] Error 1
> 
> Hmmm...  I'm not sure how to deal with this.  The problem is that UML doesn't
> draw the:
> 
> 	select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL if X86_32
> 	select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA if X86_64
> 
> definitions from arch/foo/Kconfig that tell it what modules will look like.
> 
> Should I just enable both REL and RELA in UML, or is there a better way to do
> this?

Is there no way to get this information from the UML subarch?
Which is currently X86_32 or X86_64.

Thanks,
//richard


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)