linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <502A6696.4030200@nod.at>
Date:	Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:54:14 +0200
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
CC:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)

Am 14.08.2012 16:51, schrieb David Howells:
> Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
> 
>> Is there no way to get this information from the UML subarch?
>> Which is currently X86_32 or X86_64.
> 
> Or ppc or ia64?  Or are those defunct?

Those are defunct.
AFAIK viro is working on UML/ppc64.

> I can certainly try pasting the lines from x86/Kconfig to uml/Kconfig.common
> to switch the REL/RELA bits, but it would be nice to get this from the actual
> arch if possible to reduce redundancy.

The issue happens only on -next, right?
I can have a closer look at the issue tomorrow.

Thanks,
//richard


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)