linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <502A69FA.8040805@nod.at>
Date:	Tue, 14 Aug 2012 17:08:42 +0200
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
CC:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)

Am 14.08.2012 17:06, schrieb David Howells:
> Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
> 
>> I think arch/x86/um/Kconfig makes more sense.
> 
> warthog>ls arch/um
> defconfig     Kconfig.common  Kconfig.um     Makefile-os-Linux  scripts/
> drivers/      Kconfig.debug   kernel/        Makefile-ppc       sys-ia64/
> include/      Kconfig.net     Makefile       Makefile-skas      sys-ppc/
> Kconfig.char  Kconfig.rest    Makefile-ia64  os-Linux/
> 
> It doesn't exist.  Should I create it?

arch/x86/um, not arch/um.

arch/um/ contains the generic UML stuff.
arch/x86/um/ the x86 specific UML stuff.

Thanks,
//richard



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)