[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120814183558.GA1551@moon>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 22:35:58 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
Matthew Helsley <matt.helsley@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/8] procfs: Add ability to plug in auxiliary fdinfo
providers
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 07:31:42PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > Initially we considered to inject some "show" metod to
> > file_operations but since there really a number of
> > file_operations declared inside kernel (and in real the
> > further patches cover onle eventfd/epoll/inotify) the
> > waste of memory space will be inacceptable I think.
>
> NAK. This is too ugly to live. Put it into file_operations,
> with NULL meaning default output, or don't do it at all.
>
> And no, "it's only if you enable CONFIG_SOME_SHIT" gambit won't
> fly - we have all seen it played too many times. All it takes
> is one politically-inclined induhvidual adding a dependency to
> some "vertically integrated" turd (*cough* systemd *spit* udev
> *cough*) and we are stuck with the damn thing. CGROUP shite
> is already there, DEVTMPFS is well on its way, etc.
OK, I'll put it into file_operations then (actually Pavel was
proposing the same but I've been scared by amount of file_operations
declared). Thanks!
Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists