[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <A5ED84D3BB3A384992CBB9C77DEDA4D4137FC07B@USINDEM103.corp.hds.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:51:59 +0000
From: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>
To: Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Luck, Tony (tony.luck@...el.com)" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Matthew Garrett (mjg@...hat.com)" <mjg@...hat.com>,
"dzickus@...hat.com" <dzickus@...hat.com>,
"dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@....com>
Subject: RE: efi_pstore: question about how to remove create_sysfs_entry()
from a write callback.
> Can we not serialize this with &efivars->lock if it is updated to disable interrupts? A loop in the workqueue that locks, iterates through
> ->get_next_variable, and compares against searches in
> efivars->list should work, no?
If my understanding is correct, your pseudo code is as follows.
spin_lock_irqsave(&efivars_lock);
do {
get_next_variable();
if (found new entry)
efivars_create_sysfs_entries();
} while()
spin_lock_irqrestore(&efivars_lock);
But, memory is allocated dynamically with kzalloc() in efivars_create_sysfs_entries().
I don't want to allocate memory while holding spin_lock.
Please let me know if I'm missing something.
Seiji
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists