[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120814194835.GE5760@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:48:35 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@...onical.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] floppy: do put_disk on current dr if
blk_init_queue fails
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 03:16:23PM -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote:
> If blk_init_queue fails, we do not call put_disk on the current dr
> (dr is decremented first in the error handling loop).
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@...onical.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/floppy.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/floppy.c b/drivers/block/floppy.c
> index c8d9e68..1e09e99 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/floppy.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/floppy.c
> @@ -4151,6 +4151,7 @@ static int __init do_floppy_init(void)
>
> disks[dr]->queue = blk_init_queue(do_fd_request, &floppy_lock);
> if (!disks[dr]->queue) {
> + put_disk(disks[dr]);
> err = -ENOMEM;
> goto out_put_disk;
> }
I think it will create conflict with patch 6. Will it not call put_disk()
twice on disks[dr].
Why are we retaining this patch given the fact that we will loop through
all the drives and queues in out_put_disk.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists