[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201208142338.18797.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 23:38:18 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] PM / Runtime: Fix rpm_resume() return value for power.no_callbacks set
For devices whose power.no_callbacks flag is set, rpm_resume()
should return 1 if the device's parent is already active, so that
the callers of pm_runtime_get() don't think that they have to wait
for the device to resume (asynchronously) in that case (the core
won't queue up an asynchronous resume in that case, so there's
nothing to wait for anyway).
Modify the code accordingly (and make sure that an idle notification
will be queued up on success, even if 1 is to be returned).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
---
drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
+++ linux/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
@@ -584,6 +584,7 @@ static int rpm_resume(struct device *dev
|| dev->parent->power.runtime_status == RPM_ACTIVE) {
atomic_inc(&dev->parent->power.child_count);
spin_unlock(&dev->parent->power.lock);
+ retval = 1;
goto no_callback; /* Assume success. */
}
spin_unlock(&dev->parent->power.lock);
@@ -664,7 +665,7 @@ static int rpm_resume(struct device *dev
}
wake_up_all(&dev->power.wait_queue);
- if (!retval)
+ if (retval >= 0)
rpm_idle(dev, RPM_ASYNC);
out:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists