[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1344917324.25753.0.camel@Cruz-Laptop>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:08:44 +1000
From: Cruz Julian Bishop <cruzjbishop@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>, swetland@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Fixes a potential bug in android/logger.c
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 19:01 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:50:44AM +1000, Ryan Mallon wrote:
> > On 01/08/12 14:54, Cruz Julian Bishop wrote:
> > > Previously, when calling is_between(a, b, c), the calculation was wrong.
> > > It counted C as between A and B if C was equal to B, but not A.
> > >
> > > Example of this are:
> > >
> > > is_between(1, 10, 10) = 1 (Expected: 0)
> > > is_between(1, 10, 1) = 0 (Expected: 0)
> > > is_between(20, 10, 10) = 1 (Expected: 0)
> > >
> > > And so on and so forth.
> > >
> > > Obviously, ten is not a number between one and ten - only two to eight are, so I made this patch :)
> >
> > Is nine not a number between one and ten? :-p.
> >
> > The question with a patch like this is whether the function's
> > documentation, which says it returns 1 if a < c < b is wrong, or whether
> > the implementation, which does a < c <= b is wrong. If the documentation
> > is wrong, and something is relying on the current implementation, then
> > this patch might actually break things.
>
> I agree, which is correct? I'd stick with the code for now, care to fix
> the comment instead?
>
> greg k-h
Sure, I'll send a new patch for it soon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists