[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1208150134070.32033@ionos>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 01:46:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
mingo@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] timer: clean up initializers and implement irqsafe
timers
Tejun,
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 01:12:01AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Just for the record. The thread evolved from here:
> >
> > <tj> * mod_delayed_work() can't be used from IRQ handlers.
> >
> > My answer was:
> >
> > <tglx> This function does not exist. So what?
> >
> > Which was completely appropriate as this function does not exist
> > though you used it as a primary argument for your patches.
>
> I read it as "so, what's wrong with not having mod_delayed_work()?",
> so the response.
Oh well. Your interpretation of "So what?" starts to stress my
patience.
> It exists in wq/for-3.7 and cancel_delayed_work() (the one without
> preceding __) + queue() users have been already converted.
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1334546
Do you really expect that I follow all of kernel dev posts within a
day of returning from a two weeks vacation?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists