[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <502B714E.4010700@cwi.nl>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:52:14 +0200
From: "Wouter M. Koolen" <W.M.Koolen-Wijkstra@....nl>
To: a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, paulus@...ba.org, mingo@...hat.com,
acme@...stprotocols.net
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [perf] make clean problematic bashism
Dear perf maintainers,
I attempted to compile perf 3.5.1 without worrying about installing
dependencies first. The resulting error messages were quite helpful, and
led me to install a bunch of development libraries and flex.
Unfortunately, after installing flex the build still failed, even after
make clean.
The reason for this was a bunch of generated empty flex files in util/
that were not removed by make clean. They are intended to be erased,
since the Makefile executes
rm -f util/*-{bison,flex}*
however, this command does not remove the files. I guess because {,}
alternatives are only special in bash but the makefile is run with some
other shell?
I got perf to compile now, but thought you would be interested to know
about this little problem.
With kind regards,
Wouter Koolen
PS: as a side note: GNU make has the .DELETE_ON_ERROR: special target,
which removes the target file when its generating command fails. This
would have prevented my problem and sounds like a good idea in general.
Maybe perf could make use of this feature when on GNU make?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists