[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120815093828.GB2865@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 05:38:28 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Robert Jennings <rcj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Kurt Hackel <kurt.hackel@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] promote zcache from staging
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 01:14:01PM -0500, Seth Jennings wrote:
> On 08/09/2012 03:20 PM, Dan Magenheimer wrote
> > I also wonder if you have anything else unusual in your
> > test setup, such as a fast swap disk (mine is a partition
> > on the same rotating disk as source and target of the kernel build,
> > the default install for a RHEL6 system)?
>
> I'm using a normal SATA HDD with two partitions, one for
> swap and the other an ext3 filesystem with the kernel source.
>
> > Or have you disabled cleancache?
>
> Yes, I _did_ disable cleancache. I could see where having
> cleancache enabled could explain the difference in results.
Why did you disable the cleancache? Having both (cleancache
to compress fs data) and frontswap (to compress swap data) is the
goal - while you turned one of its sources off.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists