linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] KVM: introduce readonly memslot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:44:14 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
CC:	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] KVM: introduce readonly memslot

On 08/14/2012 06:51 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> 
>> Userspace may want to modify the ROM (for example, when programming a
>> flash device).  It is also possible to map an hva range rw through one
>> slot and ro through another.
> 
> Right, can do that with multiple userspace maps to the same anonymous 
> memory region (see other email).

Yes it's possible.  It requires that we move all memory allocation to be
fd based, since userspace can't predict what memory will be dual-mapped
(at least if emulated hardware allows this).  Is this a reasonable
requirement?  Do ksm/thp/autonuma work with this?



-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/