linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] time: Improve sanity checking of timekeeping inputs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+5PVA7k8=E6NkrrNbzT3=6wPE7UdnrQ94EjkGfxW6kU9u5MWw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:39:19 -0400
From:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>
To:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Zhouping Liu <zliu@...hat.com>, CAI Qian <caiqian@...hat.com>,
	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] time: Improve sanity checking of timekeeping inputs

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:36 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> wrote:
> Thomas, Ingo,
>         Here's a fix against tip/timers/urgent that addresses
> timekeeping edge cases detected by both a bad BIOS and system
> fuzzing w/ trinity. Thanks to Sasha Levin and CAI Qian for
> finding and reporting these!
>
> Let me know if you have any tweaks you want to see.
>
> thanks
> -john
>
> Unexpected behavior could occur if the time is set to
> a value large enough to overflow a 64bit ktime_t
> (which is something larger then the year 2262).
>
> Also unexpected behavior could occur if large negative
> offsets are injected via adjtimex.
>
> So this patch improves the sanity check timekeeping inputs
> by improving the timespec_valid() check, and then makes better
> use of timespec_valid() to make sure we don't set the time to
> an invalid negative value or one that overflows ktime_t.
>
> Note: This does not protect from setting the time close to
> overflowing ktime_t and then letting natural accumulation
> cause the overflow.
>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Zhouping Liu <zliu@...hat.com>
> Cc: CAI Qian <caiqian@...hat.com>
> Cc: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Reported-by: CAI Qian <caiqian@...hat.com>
> Reported-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/ktime.h     |    7 -------
>  include/linux/time.h      |   22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>  kernel/time/timekeeping.c |   26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

This patch fixes a boot regression on machines with crappy BIOS.  Is
this going to get committed soon?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844249

josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/