[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87boicz8l7.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:40:52 +0200
From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <shchepetkov@...ras.ru>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<ldv-project@...ras.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Call netif_carrier_off() after register_netdev()
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com> writes:
> But if you do it beforehand then it doesn't have the intended effect.
> (Supposed to be fixed by 22604c866889c4b2e12b73cbf1683bda1b72a313, which
> had to be reverted: c276e098d3ee33059b4a1c747354226cec58487c.)
>
> So you have to do it after, but without dropping the RTNL lock in
> between.
So you may want to add something like
int register_netdev_carrier_off(struct net_device *dev)
{
int err;
rtnl_lock();
err = register_netdevice(dev);
if (!err)
set_bit(__LINK_STATE_NOCARRIER, &dev->state)
rtnl_unlock();
return err;
}
for these drivers?
Bjørn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists