[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1345041485.31459.89.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:38:05 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Let O= makes handle relative paths
On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 15:18 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:06:34AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > That was the case in the past, but IIRC PeterZ advocated not to and I
> > agreed.
>
> Maybe you guys need to explain yourselves :) I mean, the dir is not
> present so we're not overwriting anything. And since we say "O=..." on
> the command line, it is actually expected that we really mean it... why
> type it, otherwise?
Because you're an idiot and made a typo ;-) Happens to me all the time.
The regular kernel build doesn't create non-existent O= targets either
iirc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists