lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:38:05 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Let O= makes handle relative paths On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 15:18 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:06:34AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > That was the case in the past, but IIRC PeterZ advocated not to and I > > agreed. > > Maybe you guys need to explain yourselves :) I mean, the dir is not > present so we're not overwriting anything. And since we say "O=..." on > the command line, it is actually expected that we really mean it... why > type it, otherwise? Because you're an idiot and made a typo ;-) Happens to me all the time. The regular kernel build doesn't create non-existent O= targets either iirc. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists