linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf: Let O= makes handle relative paths

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1345041485.31459.89.camel@twins>
Date:	Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:38:05 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Let O= makes handle relative paths

On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 15:18 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:06:34AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > That was the case in the past, but IIRC PeterZ advocated not to and I
> > agreed.
> 
> Maybe you guys need to explain yourselves :) I mean, the dir is not
> present so we're not overwriting anything. And since we say "O=..." on
> the command line, it is actually expected that we really mean it... why
> type it, otherwise?

Because you're an idiot and made a typo ;-) Happens to me all the time.

The regular kernel build doesn't create non-existent O= targets either
iirc. 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/