[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120815172219.4e4d5ef5@de.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:22:19 +0200
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] cputime: Consolidate vtime handling on context
switch
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:16:49 +0200
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> The archs that implement virtual cputime accounting all
> flush the cputime of a task when it gets descheduled
> and sometimes set up some ground initialization for the
> next task to account its cputime.
>
> These archs all put their own hooks in their context
> switch callbacks and handle the off-case themselves.
>
> Consolidate this by creating a new account_switch_vtime()
> callback called in generic code right after a context switch
> and that these archs must implement to flush the prev task
> cputime and initialize the next task cputime related state.
That change requires that the accounting for the previous process
can be done before finish_arch_switch() completed. With the old
code the architecture could to the accounting call in the middle
of finish_arch_switch, that is not possible anymore. Dunno if this
is relevant or not. For s390 the new code should work fine.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists