[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xr93obmcb2sh.fsf@gthelen.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 08:19:58 -0700
From: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, devel@...nvz.org,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, yinghan@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] kmem accounting basic infrastructure
On Wed, Aug 15 2012, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
>> > That is not what the kernel does, in general. We assume that if he wants
>> > that memory and we can serve it, we should. Also, not all kernel memory
>> > is unreclaimable. We can shrink the slabs, for instance. Ying Han
>> > claims she has patches for that already...
>>
>> Are those patches somewhere around?
>
> You can already shrink the reclaimable slabs (dentries / inodes) via
> calls to the subsystem specific shrinkers. Did Ying Han do anything to
> go beyond that?
cc: Ying
The Google shrinker patches enhance prune_dcache_sb() to limit dentry
pressure to a specific memcg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists