[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201208152159.51385.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 21:59:51 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESION] Suspend hangs with 3.6-rc1 on Lenovo T60 notebook
On Wednesday, August 15, 2012, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 08/15/2012 07:13 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > Suspend oopses in generic_ide_suspend() because dev_get_drvdata()
> > returns NULL (dev->p->driver_data == NULL) and this function is not
> > prepared for this.
> >
> > I bisected it to 0998d063 (device-core: Ensure drvdata = NULL when no
> > driver is bound). Reverting it fixes suspend.
> >
>
> First of all, thanks for reporting and bisecting this. With that said,
> I must say that this is very weird. The patch in question:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=0998d063
>
> Only makes dev-drvdata NULL in 2 cases:
> 1) The probe method of the driver fails
> 2) The driver has been detached from the device by calling one of:
> device_release_driver() or driver_detach()
>
> Note that in both code paths dev->driver also gets set to NULL, and
> other generic ide driver callbacks very much depend on that not being
> NULL, ie:
>
> static int generic_ide_remove(struct device *dev)
> {
> ide_drive_t *drive = to_ide_device(dev);
> struct ide_driver *drv = to_ide_driver(dev->driver);
>
> if (drv->remove)
> drv->remove(drive);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> Also how can a drivers suspend callback get called if dev->driver is NULL,
> since that callback would normally be "reached" through dev->driver, so
> something weird is going on here ...
No, it wouldn't, because it is a bus type callback and it is invoked for
all devices whose bus type is ide_bus_type, regardless of whether or not
their driver field is NULL.
It clearly should check if drive is not NULL before using that pointer.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists