linux-kernel - Re: [patch net-next 01/16] net: introduce upper device lists

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <502C07B4.6050104@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:33:56 +0200
From:	Nicolas de Pesloüan 
	<nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com>
To:	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
CC:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, faisal.latif@...el.com,
	roland@...nel.org, sean.hefty@...el.com, hal.rosenstock@...il.com,
	fubar@...ibm.com, andy@...yhouse.net, divy@...lsio.com,
	jitendra.kalsaria@...gic.com, sony.chacko@...gic.com,
	linux-driver@...gic.com, kaber@...sh.net, ursula.braun@...ibm.com,
	blaschka@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux390@...ibm.com,
	shemminger@...tta.com, therbert@...gle.com,
	xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, joe@...ches.com,
	gregory.v.rose@...el.com, john.r.fastabend@...el.com,
	linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	fbl@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 01/16] net: introduce upper device lists

Le 13/08/2012 19:31, Jiri Pirko a écrit :
> Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 07:04:11PM CEST, bhutchings@...arflare.com wrote:

>>> +struct netdev_upper {
>>> +	struct net_device *dev;
>>> +	bool unique;
>>
>> This needs a better name.  It doesn't really have anything to do with
>> uniqueness and doesn't ensure exclusivity.  I think that it would be
>> fine to keep the 'master' term.
>
> Hmm. I admit that "unique" I do not like too much as well. But "master"
> I like even less.
>
> This flag should ensure exclusivity. Only one upper device with this
> flag can be present at a time.

Well, can't we simply call it "upper_device"?

And as we only have a single field, this is exclusive by design.

	Nicolas.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/