linux-kernel - Re: [patch 4/8] fs, exportfs: Add export_encode_inode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120815210237.GF25421@moon>
Date:	Thu, 16 Aug 2012 01:02:37 +0400
From:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
To:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
	James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
	Matthew Helsley <matt.helsley@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/8] fs, exportfs: Add export_encode_inode_fh helper

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 04:45:46PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 01:21:20PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > To provide fsnotify object inodes being watched without
> > binding to alphabetical path we need to encode them with
> > exportfs help. This patch adds a helper which operates
> > with plain inodes directly.
> 
> I don't get it--this seems like a really roundabout way to get inode and
> generation number, if that's all you want.

We can re-open the targets via filehandle on restore, this was the idea.
All this series aimed to achieve the way to restore objects after checkpoit,
thus we need to provide additional information which would be enough.

> On the other hand, if you want a real filehandle then wouldn't you want
> to e.g. call the filesystem's ->encode_fh() if necessary, as
> exportfs_encode_fh() does?

Well, one of the problem I hit when I've been trying to use encode_fh
is that every new implementation of encode_fh will require some size
(even unknown) in buffer where encoded data pushed. Correct me please
if I'm wrong. But with export_encode_inode_fh there is a small buffer
with pretty known size needed on stack needed for printing data in
fdinfo.

	Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/