linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v2 4/7] modsig: add integrity_module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALLzPKa_4BaaZPjzDcy_QG9t1Gsauk6myU-WzaBab8A-w+9LJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:13:57 +0300
From:	"Kasatkin, Dmitry" <dmitry.kasatkin@...el.com>
To:	Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>
Cc:	zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, jmorris@...ei.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	dhowells@...hat.com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 4/7] modsig: add integrity_module_check hook

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Serge Hallyn
<serge.hallyn@...onical.com> wrote:
> Quoting Dmitry Kasatkin (dmitry.kasatkin@...el.com):
>> IMA measures/appraises modules when modprobe or insmod opens and read them.
>> Unfortunately, there are no guarantees between what is read by userspace and
>> what is passed to the kernel via load_module system call. This patch adds a
>> hook called integrity_module_check() to verify the integrity of the module
>> being loaded.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...el.com>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/integrity.h |   10 ++++++++++
>>  kernel/module.c           |    9 +++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/integrity.h b/include/linux/integrity.h
>> index 66c5fe9..a80ec06 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/integrity.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/integrity.h
>> @@ -37,4 +37,14 @@ static inline void integrity_inode_free(struct inode *inode)
>>       return;
>>  }
>>  #endif /* CONFIG_INTEGRITY_H */
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEGRITY_MODULES
>> +int integrity_module_check(const void *hdr, const unsigned long len);
>
> sadly not bisect-safe, since integrity_module_check() is defined in
> the next patch.
>

Ok.. Hooks come after implementation...
Will swap.

Thanks.

>> +#else
>> +static inline int integrity_module_check(const void *buf, unsigned long len)
>> +{
>> +     return 0;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>>  #endif /* _LINUX_INTEGRITY_H */
>> diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
>> index 4edbd9c..791da47 100644
>> --- a/kernel/module.c
>> +++ b/kernel/module.c
>> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/jump_label.h>
>>  #include <linux/pfn.h>
>>  #include <linux/bsearch.h>
>> +#include <linux/integrity.h>
>>
>>  #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>>  #include <trace/events/module.h>
>> @@ -2437,6 +2438,14 @@ static int copy_and_check(struct load_info *info,
>>
>>       info->hdr = hdr;
>>       info->len = len;
>> +
>> +     err = integrity_module_check(hdr, len);
>> +     if (err < 0)
>> +             goto free_hdr;
>> +
>> +     /* cut signature tail */
>> +     info->len = err;
>> +
>>       return 0;
>>
>>  free_hdr:
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/