[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120815.151223.1108632083114612511.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:12:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: bhutchings@...arflare.com
Cc: jiri@...nulli.us, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
faisal.latif@...el.com, roland@...nel.org, sean.hefty@...el.com,
hal.rosenstock@...il.com, fubar@...ibm.com, andy@...yhouse.net,
divy@...lsio.com, jitendra.kalsaria@...gic.com,
sony.chacko@...gic.com, linux-driver@...gic.com, kaber@...sh.net,
ursula.braun@...ibm.com, blaschka@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux390@...ibm.com, shemminger@...tta.com, therbert@...gle.com,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, joe@...ches.com,
gregory.v.rose@...el.com, john.r.fastabend@...el.com,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
fbl@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 01/15] net: introduce upper device lists
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 23:33:44 +0100
> I think we will also need to limit the depth of the device stack so we
> don't run out of stack space here. __netif_receive() implements a kind
> of tail recursion whenever a packet is passed up, but
> __netdev_has_upper_dev() can't avoid doing real recursion (without the
> addition of a flag to net_device so it can mark its progress).
Agreed, we need some kind of limit here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists