[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <502C4B09.6070406@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 18:21:13 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [discussion]sched: a rough proposal to enable power saving in
scheduler
On 8/15/2012 6:14 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> The idea Matthew and I have is simply planning for a shorter
> sleep period (discarding the outliers to the high end in the
> function once known as detect_repeating_patterns), and going
> to a deeper C state if we have significantly overslept.
>
> The new estimation code is easy, but for the past days I have
> been looking through the timer code to figure out how such a
> timer could fire, and how we could recognize it without it
> looking like a normal wakeup, if we do not end up accidentally
> waking up another CPU, etc...
this sort of code we recently developed already in house;
i'm surprised it hasn't been pasted to lkml yet
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists