[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120816100536.GF31784@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:05:37 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/31] arm64: Exception handling
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 02:03:47PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 August 2012, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_AARCH32_EMULATION
> > +#define compat_thumb_mode(regs) \
> > + (((regs)->pstate & COMPAT_PSR_T_BIT))
> > +#else
> > +#define compat_thumb_mode(regs) (0)
> > +#endif
>
> The symbol we use on other platforms is CONFIG_COMPAT. I don't think you
> need to have a separate CONFIG_AARCH32_EMULATION
Using COMPAT does preclude the possibility of doing something like the x32
ABI later on though. Some other architectures seem to do something similar
(MIPS32_COMPAT, IA32_EMULATION).
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists