[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120816105134.GJ31784@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:51:34 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 25/31] arm64: Performance counters support
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 04:11:11PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 August 2012, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> >
> > This patch adds support for the AArch64 performance counters.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h | 22 +
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/pmu.h | 82 +++
> > arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 1368 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > tools/perf/perf.h | 6 +
>
> Can you explain how AArch64 performance counters differ from the 32
> bit ones? Do they work for AArch32 user space under AArch64 kernels?
> Is it possible to share parts of the implementation with arch/arm?
Perf should work for compat tasks, yes. I'd like to share some of the code
with arch/arm/ and I've started reworking the arch/arm/ stuff to accomodate
this better:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git perf/updates
I'm not sure how well it will fit in drivers/ but I'm certainly willing to
give it a try.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists