[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20344.1345115849@neuling.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:17:29 +1000
From: Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
cc: K Prasad <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: powerpc/perf: hw breakpoints return ENOSPC
Peter,
> > On this second syscall, fetch_bp_busy_slots() sets slots.pinned to be 1,
> > despite there being no breakpoint on this CPU. This is because the call
> > the task_bp_pinned, checks all CPUs, rather than just the current CPU.
> > POWER7 only has one hardware breakpoint per CPU (ie. HBP_NUM=1), so we
> > return ENOSPC.
>
> I think this comes from the ptrace legacy, we register a breakpoint on
> all cpus because when we migrate a task it cannot fail to migrate the
> breakpoint.
>
> Its one of the things I hate most about the hwbp stuff as it relates to
> perf.
>
> Frederic knows more...
Maybe I should wait for Frederic to respond but I'm not sure I
understand what you're saying.
I can see how using ptrace hw breakpoints and perf hw breakpoints at the
same time could be a problem, but I'm not sure how this would stop it.
Are you saying that we need to keep at least 1 slot free at all times,
so that we can use it for ptrace?
Is "perf record -e mem:0x10000000 true" ever going to be able to work on
POWER7 with only one hw breakpoint resource per CPU?
Thanks,
Mikey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists