[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1345118411.3393.219.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:00:11 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
Cc: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] UBI: use the whole MTD device size to get
bad_peb_limit
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 10:13 +0200, Richard Genoud wrote:
> > + To put it differently, if this value is 20, UBI will try
> to reserve
> > + about 1.9% of physical eraseblocks for bad blocks
> handling. And that
> > + will be 1.9% of eraseblocks on the entire NAND chip, not
> just the MTD
> > + partition UBI attaches. This means that if you have, say,
> if a NAND
> I don't quite understand this sentence.
> Maybe you meant:
> This means that if you have, say, a NAND flash chip that admits a
> maximum of 40 bad eraseblocks [...]
> (but I'm not a native english speaker !)
Fixed, thanks!
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists