| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <502CE840.4060802@panasas.com> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:32:00 +0300 From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com> To: <dedekind1@...il.com> CC: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>, <bhalevy@...ian.com>, <jack@...e.cz>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, <tytso@....edu>, <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>, <mikulas@...ax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, <hch@...radead.org>, <dushistov@...l.ru>, <osd-dev@...n-osd.org>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] exofs: remove lock/unlock super On 08/16/2012 03:20 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 12:00 +0200, Marco Stornelli wrote: >> From: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com> >> >> Remove lock and unlock super operation. >> >> Signed-off-by: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com> > > Acked-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com> > Are you sure? It used to be that exofs_sync_fs() could be called concurrently. What about two "bash -c sync" calls or a sync and an unmount in parallel. anything protecting that? If so then sure, but please let me test first. Boaz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists