[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201208161154.10891.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:54:10 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/31] arm64: Exception handling
On Thursday 16 August 2012, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 02:03:47PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 14 August 2012, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_AARCH32_EMULATION
> > > +#define compat_thumb_mode(regs) \
> > > + (((regs)->pstate & COMPAT_PSR_T_BIT))
> > > +#else
> > > +#define compat_thumb_mode(regs) (0)
> > > +#endif
> >
> > The symbol we use on other platforms is CONFIG_COMPAT. I don't think you
> > need to have a separate CONFIG_AARCH32_EMULATION
>
> Using COMPAT does preclude the possibility of doing something like the x32
> ABI later on though. Some other architectures seem to do something similar
> (MIPS32_COMPAT, IA32_EMULATION).
Ok, fair enough.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists