linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] UBI: replace MTD_UBI_BEB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1345123718.3393.235.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 16 Aug 2012 16:28:38 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
Cc:	Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] UBI: replace MTD_UBI_BEB_LIMIT with user-space
 parameter

On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 11:57 +0300, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> 
> For the simplest systems (those having one ubi device) that need a
> limit
> *other* than the default (20 per 1024), they can simply set the config
> to their chosen value, as they were used to.
> 
> With you approach, these system MUST pass the limit parameter via the
> ioctl / module-parameter. 

Yeah, when you change the default, you usually need to do an extra step.
It does not feel too bad, and I would not keep additional configuration
option for a hypothetical user. If someone suffers, we can add an option
to change the default. But I'd start without it. So, I think it is OK to
remove this.


-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)