linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Powerpc 8xx CPM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:29:18 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	leroy christophe <christophe.leroy@....fr>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Vitaly Bordug <vitb@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@...ck.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Powerpc 8xx CPM_UART delay in receive

> The PowerPC CPM is working differently. It doesn't use a fifo but 
> buffers. Buffers are handed to the microprocessor only when they are 
> full or after a timeout period which is adjustable. In the driver, the 

Which is different how - remembering we empty the FIFO on an IRQ

> buffers are configured with a size of 32 bytes. And the timeout is set 
> to the size of the buffer. That is this timeout that I'm reducing to 1 
> byte in my proposed patch. I can't see what it would break for high 
> speed I/O.

How can a timeout be measured in "bytes". Can we have a bit more clarity
on how the hardware works and take it from there ?

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/