[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120816150647.GA22010@sig21.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:06:47 +0200
From: Johannes Stezenbach <js@...21.net>
To: "Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer" <markus@...rhumer.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
chris.mason@...ionio.com, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...nedhand.com>,
richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Update LZO compression
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 08:27:15AM +0200, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote:
> On 2012-08-15 16:45, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> >
> > I made the attached quick hack userspace code
> > using ARM kernel headers and barebox unlzop code.
> > (new == your new code, old == linux-3.5 git, test == new + your suggested change)
> > (sorry I had no time to clean it up)
>
> My suggested COPY4 replacement probably has a lot of load stalls - maybe some
> ARM expert could have a look and suggest a more efficient implementation.
>
> In any case, I still would like to see the new code in linux-next because
> of the huge improvements on other modern CPUs.
Well, ~2x speedup on x86 is certainly a good achievement, but there
are more ARM based devices than there are PCs, and I guess many
embedded devices use lzo compressed kernels and file systems
while I'm not convinced many PCs rely on lzo in the kernel.
I know everyone's either busy or on vacation, but it would
be so cool if someone could test on a more modern ARM core,
with the userspace test code I posted it should be easy to do.
Johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists