linux-kernel - Re: NULL pointer dereference in ext4_ext_remove

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:25:13 -0400
From:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc:	Marti Raudsepp <marti@...fo.org>,
	Kernel hackers <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ext4 hackers <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, maze@...gle.com
Subject: Re: NULL pointer dereference in ext4_ext_remove_space on 3.5.1

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:10:51PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> 
> Here is the dmesg. BTW, it seems 3.5.0 don't have this issue.

Fengguang,

It sounds like you have a (at least fairly) reliable reproduction for
this problem?  Is it something you can share?  It would be good to get
this into our test suites, since it was _not_ something that was
caught by xfstests, apparently.

Can you see if this patch addresses it?  (The first two patch hunks
are the same debugging additions I had posted before.)

It looks like the responsible commit is 968dee7722: "ext4: fix hole
punch failure when depth is greater than 0".  I had thought this patch
was low risk if you weren't using the new punch ioctl, but it turns
out it did make a critical change in the non-punch (i.e., truncate)
code path, which is what the addition of "i = 0;" in the patch below
addresses.

Regards,

    	     	       	     	       	  - Ted

diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index 769151d..fa829dc 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -2432,6 +2432,10 @@ ext4_ext_rm_leaf(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
 
 	/* the header must be checked already in ext4_ext_remove_space() */
 	ext_debug("truncate since %u in leaf to %u\n", start, end);
+	if (!path[depth].p_hdr && !path[depth].p_bh) {
+		EXT4_ERROR_INODE(inode, "depth %d", depth);
+		BUG_ON(1);
+	}
 	if (!path[depth].p_hdr)
 		path[depth].p_hdr = ext_block_hdr(path[depth].p_bh);
 	eh = path[depth].p_hdr;
@@ -2730,6 +2734,10 @@ cont:
 		/* this is index block */
 		if (!path[i].p_hdr) {
 			ext_debug("initialize header\n");
+			if (!path[i].p_hdr && !path[i].p_bh) {
+				EXT4_ERROR_INODE(inode, "i=%d", i);
+				BUG_ON(1);
+			}
 			path[i].p_hdr = ext_block_hdr(path[i].p_bh);
 		}
 
@@ -2828,6 +2836,7 @@ out:
 	kfree(path);
 	if (err == -EAGAIN) {
 		path = NULL;
+		i = 0;
 		goto again;
 	}
 	ext4_journal_stop(handle);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/