linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 04/25] xen/arm: sync

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1345131377-14713-4-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Date:	Thu, 16 Aug 2012 16:35:56 +0100
From:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
To:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	<xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	<Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>, <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	<tim@....org>, <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	<arnd@...db.de>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 04/25] xen/arm: sync_bitops

sync_bitops functions are equivalent to the SMP implementation of the
original functions, independently from CONFIG_SMP being defined.

We need them because _set_bit etc are not SMP safe if !CONFIG_SMP. But
under Xen you might be communicating with a completely external entity
who might be on another CPU (e.g. two uniprocessor guests communicating
via event channels and grant tables). So we need a variant of the bit
ops which are SMP safe even on a UP kernel.

Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/sync_bitops.h |   27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/sync_bitops.h

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/sync_bitops.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/sync_bitops.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..63479ee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/sync_bitops.h
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+#ifndef __ASM_SYNC_BITOPS_H__
+#define __ASM_SYNC_BITOPS_H__
+
+#include <asm/bitops.h>
+#include <asm/system.h>
+
+/* sync_bitops functions are equivalent to the SMP implementation of the
+ * original functions, independently from CONFIG_SMP being defined.
+ *
+ * We need them because _set_bit etc are not SMP safe if !CONFIG_SMP. But
+ * under Xen you might be communicating with a completely external entity
+ * who might be on another CPU (e.g. two uniprocessor guests communicating
+ * via event channels and grant tables). So we need a variant of the bit
+ * ops which are SMP safe even on a UP kernel.
+ */
+
+#define sync_set_bit(nr, p)		_set_bit(nr, p)
+#define sync_clear_bit(nr, p)		_clear_bit(nr, p)
+#define sync_change_bit(nr, p)		_change_bit(nr, p)
+#define sync_test_and_set_bit(nr, p)	_test_and_set_bit(nr, p)
+#define sync_test_and_clear_bit(nr, p)	_test_and_clear_bit(nr, p)
+#define sync_test_and_change_bit(nr, p)	_test_and_change_bit(nr, p)
+#define sync_test_bit(nr, addr)		test_bit(nr, addr)
+#define sync_cmpxchg			cmpxchg
+
+
+#endif
-- 
1.7.2.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/