linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] slub: try to get cpu partial slab even if we get enough objects for cpu freelist

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:08:23 +0000
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	JoonSoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
cc:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: try to get cpu partial slab even if we get enough
 objects for cpu freelist

On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, JoonSoo Kim wrote:

> But, if you prefer that s->cpu_partial is for both cpu slab and cpu
> partial slab,
> get_partial_node() needs an another minor fix.
> We should add number of objects in cpu slab when we refill cpu partial slab.
> Following is my suggestion.
>
> @@ -1546,7 +1546,7 @@ static void *get_partial_node(struct kmem_cache *s,
>         spin_lock(&n->list_lock);
>         list_for_each_entry_safe(page, page2, &n->partial, lru) {
>                 void *t = acquire_slab(s, n, page, object == NULL);
> -               int available;
> +               int available, nr = 0;
>
>                 if (!t)
>                         break;
> @@ -1557,10 +1557,10 @@ static void *get_partial_node(struct kmem_cache *s,
>                         object = t;
>                         available =  page->objects - page->inuse;
>                 } else {
> -                       available = put_cpu_partial(s, page, 0);
> +                       nr = put_cpu_partial(s, page, 0);
>                         stat(s, CPU_PARTIAL_NODE);
>                 }
> -               if (kmem_cache_debug(s) || available > s->cpu_partial / 2)
> +               if (kmem_cache_debug(s) || (available + nr) >
> s->cpu_partial / 2)
>                         break;
>
>         }
>
> If you agree with this suggestion, I send a patch for this.

What difference does this patch make? At the end of the day you need the
total number of objects available in the partial slabs and the cpu slab
for comparison.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/