[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120816165426.GB22518@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:54:26 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>, gleb@...hat.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] kvm: level irqfd support
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:39:35PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/16/2012 07:36 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> >> What if a level irqfd shares a line with a KVM_IRQ_LINE ioctl? Then an
> >> EOI can de-assert the irqfd source, but the line is kept high by the
> >> last KVM_IRQ_LINE invocation.
> >
> > Exactly. So 1 ID for userspace and 1 for irqfd.
>
> Gaa, this mess belongs in userspace.
Not sure I understand what you refer to.
I meant simply
#define KVM_IRQFD_IRQ_SOURCE_ID 1
request it at kvm init.
As opposed to using KVM_USERSPACE_IRQ_SOURCE_ID like we do now
for edge.
Does this seem acceptable to you?
> --
> error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists