[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120816182944.GN11188@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 20:29:44 +0200
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Alex Shi <alex.shu@...el.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] mm: make clear_huge_page cache clear only around
the fault address
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:43:56PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Hm.. I think with static_key we can avoid cache overhead here. I'll try.
Could you elaborate on the static_key? Is it some sort of self
modifying code?
> Thanks, for review. Could you take a look at huge zero page patchset? ;)
I've noticed that too, nice :). I'm checking some detail on the
wrprotect fault behavior but I'll comment there.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists