[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120816204913.GG28505@cathedrallabs.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 16:49:13 -0400
From: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@...vo.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/4] device_cgroup: replace internally whitelist
with exception list
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 01:08:44PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 15:04:14 -0400
> aris@...vo.org wrote:
>
> > The original model of device_cgroup is having a whitelist where all the
> > allowed devices are listed. The problem with this approach is that is
> > impossible to have the case of allowing everything but few devices.
> >
> > The reason for that lies in the way the whitelist is handled internally:
> > since there's only a whitelist, the "all devices" entry would have to be
> > removed and replaced by the entire list of possible devices but the ones
> > that are being denied. Since dev_t is 32 bits long, representing the allowed
> > devices as a bitfield is not memory efficient.
> >
> > This patch replaces the "whitelist" by a "exceptions" list and the default
> > policy is kept as "deny_all" variable in dev_cgroup structure.
>
> The patches look reasonable to me. I suggest you resend them after
> kernel summit and cc a few additional people: Serge Hallyn, Pavel
> Emelyanov and James Morris.
thanks, will do. will include the checkpatch fixes as well.
--
Aristeu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists