[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <502E06C8.8090508@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 17:54:32 +0900
From: Alex Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Anton Vorontsov <cbou@...l.ru>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Leela Krishna Amudala <leelakrishna.a@...il.com>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences
On 08/17/2012 06:47 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, August 16, 2012, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> Overdue revision of this new feature, some changes required additional thought
>> and rework.
>>
>> The most important change is in the way power sequences are expressed in the
>> device tree. In order to avoid having to specify #address-cells, #size-cells and
>> reg properties, the @ notation in the step names is dropped, and instead a
>> fixed, sequential naming is adopted. The type of the resource used by a step is
>> decided by the presence of some recognized properties:
>>
>> power-on-sequence {
>> step0 {
>> regulator = "power";
>> enable;
>> };
>> step1 {
>> delay = <10000>;
>> };
>> step2 {
>> pwm = "backlight";
>> enable;
>> };
>> ...
>>
>> To me this looks safe, clear and close to the platform data representation, but
>> needs approval from DT experts.
>>
>> Resources are still referenced by name instead of having their phandles defined
>> directly inside the sequences, as previous discussion came to the conclusion
>> that doing so would require controversial changes to the regulator and PWM
>> frameworks, and that having the resources declared at the device level was
>> making sense logically speaking.
>>
>> Other changes/fixes since last revision:
>> * Move to drivers/power/ (hope this is ok with the maintainers?)
>> * Use microseconds for delay
>> * Use devm for PWM resources and remove cleanup function as all resources are
>> devm-managed
>> * Remove "-gpio" suffix for GPIO reference in the driver
>> * Remove params structure
>> * Make power_seq structure private
>> * Number of steps in a sequence is explicitly stated instead of resorting to a
>> "stop" sequence step
>> * Delays are a step instead of being a step parameter
>> * Use flexible member arrays to limit number of memory allocations
>> * Add documentation to DT bindings
>>
>> There was a lot of feedback on the previous version (thanks!) so if I forgot
>> to address some important point, please bring it to my attention again.
>>
>> Alexandre Courbot (3):
>> Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences
>> pwm_backlight: use power sequences
>> tegra: add pwm backlight device tree nodes
>
> May I ask that the next version of this patchset be CCed to
> linux-pm@...r.kernel.org?
Will do.
Alex.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists