linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 04/31] arm64: MMU definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120817090451.GP11011@atomide.com>
Date:	Fri, 17 Aug 2012 02:04:52 -0700
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc:	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/31] arm64: MMU definitions

* Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com> [120814 10:57]:
> The virtual memory layout is described in
> Documentation/arm64/memory.txt. This patch adds the MMU definitions for
> the 4KB and 64KB translation table configurations. The SECTION_SIZE is
> 2MB with 4KB page and 512MB with 64KB page configuration.
> 
> PHYS_OFFSET is calculated at run-time and stored in a variable (no
> run-time code patching at this stage).

Care to clarify this part a bit? Is the memory standardized somehow
now and not needed? Or do we still need to add that for various SoCs
later on?

Other than that:

Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/