[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120817104031.GM4559@mwanda>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:40:31 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Thorsten Nowak <not@....fhg.de>
Cc: Thorsten Nowak <thorsten.nowak@....fraunhofer.de>,
Manuel Stahl <manuel.stahl@....fraunhofer.de>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] staging: iio: Integration gyroscope itg3200
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:27:18AM +0200, Thorsten Nowak wrote:
> + /* Guaranteed to be aligned with 8 byte boundary */
> + if (buffer->scan_timestamp)
> + *(s64 *)(((phys_addr_t)st->rx + len
> + + sizeof(s64) - 1) & ~(sizeof(s64) - 1))
> + = pf->timestamp;
It took me a while to figure this one out. The indenting is wrong
and, in fact, the whole statement is horrible to look at.
[snip]
> +static int itg3200_ring_postenable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> +{
> + u8 t;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = itg3200_spi_read_reg_8(indio_dev,
> + ITG3200_REG_POWER_MANAGEMENT,
> + &t);
> + if (ret)
> + goto error_ret;
> +
> + if (iio_scan_mask_query(indio_dev->ring, 1))
> + t &= ~ITG3200_STANDBY_GYRO_X;
> + else
> + t |= ~ITG3200_STANDBY_GYRO_X;
> +
Should this be:
t |= ITG3200_STANDBY_GYRO_X;
like the others?
> + if (iio_scan_mask_query(indio_dev->ring, 2))
> + t &= ~ITG3200_STANDBY_GYRO_Y;
> + else
> + t |= ITG3200_STANDBY_GYRO_Y;
> +
> + if (iio_scan_mask_query(indio_dev->ring, 3))
> + t &= ITG3200_STANDBY_GYRO_Z;
> + else
> + t |= ITG3200_STANDBY_GYRO_Z;
> +
> + ret = itg3200_spi_write_reg_8(indio_dev,
> + ITG3200_REG_POWER_MANAGEMENT,
> + t);
> + if (ret)
> + goto error_ret;
> +
> + return iio_triggered_ring_postenable(indio_dev);
> +error_ret:
> + return ret;
> +}
[snip]
> +static ssize_t itg3200_write_frequency(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf,
> + size_t len)
> +{
> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + long val;
> + int ret;
> + u8 t;
> +
> + ret = kstrtol(buf, 10, &val);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> +
> + ret = itg3200_read_reg_8(indio_dev, ITG3200_REG_DLPF, &t);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_ret;
> +
> + t = ((t & ITG3200_DLPF_CFG_MASK) ? 1000 : 8000) / val - 1;
Potential divide by zero bug. There may be others as well.
> +
> + ret = itg3200_write_reg_8(indio_dev, ITG3200_REG_SAMPLE_RATE_DIV, t);
> +
> +err_ret:
> + mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> +
> + return ret ? ret : len;
> +}
> +
[snip]
> +static int itg3200_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> + /* int ret; */
> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +
> + iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
> +
> + /*
> + ret = itg3200_stop_device(indio_dev);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_ret;
Remove these commented out bits before submitting.
> + */
> +
> + if (client->irq && gpio_is_valid(irq_to_gpio(client->irq)) > 0)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
gpio_is_valid() returns true or false so this should be:
if (client->irq && gpio_is_valid(irq_to_gpio(client->irq)))
> + itg3200_remove_trigger(indio_dev);
> +
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists